Reputation is all about having advocates to support you in time of crisis. An article in today’s Wall Street Journal on Lehman Brothers CFO, Erin Callan, supports this side benefit of building relationships before you need them. “To squash fears that Lehman could face the same kind of liquidity squeeze as Bear (now being acquired by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.), Ms. Callan has had hundreds of face-to-face meetings and phone calls with investors and trading partners. She aggressively roots out rumors, even while pushing her bosses to disclose more financial information.” Sounds to me like she is out winning the vote every day.

The risk is often worth the reward.

I guess there is something for everyone and every profession. I have blogged before about reputationdefender. The company (whose slogan is “watch your back”) helps individuals and families defend their reputations by getting negative comments taken down from the Internet, lowered in the search rankings or explained more accurately. They counsel individual and organizations on strategies for removing harmful information which is ultimately a good thing. Now there is politiciandefender.com for those politicos who need to counter negative or untrue bloggerisms with truthful messages. As the site says, “The program is designed to build personal branding online and minimize harmful blog posts that would influence an election. Our company allows politicians to hire our bloggers to create posts on social media venues and blogs throughout the Internet in an effort to get the target message across.” In essence, the company will counterpunch or should I say counterpost right back when a politician’s reputation is being pummeled. I guess there truly is something for everyone and expect soon to see celebritydefender, professordefender, prdefender, lawyerdefender, doctordefender, cashierdefender, computerhelplinedefender, etc. You see where this is going. 

On another subject, I am often asked what companies should do to reduce their ever-mounting reputation risk. As corruption, fraud, recalls, security breaches, tainted products and financial wrongdoing continues to escalate, one idea that deserves serious consideration is assigning reputation risk responsibilities to company boards, officers or outside firms. UBS recently announced that they would establish a stand-alone risk committee as part of their board restructuring. This committee would be responsible for assessing and being informed about management’s strategy for monitoring and managing corporate reputation threats.  Financial Week has an excellent article by Jeff Nash on how companies are now in the hunt for hiring chief risk officers and fully understanding their own risk scenarios today. He quotes Spencer Stuart who told him that only 3% of S&P 500 companies had stand-alone risk committees as of 2007. That is not encouraging. Apparently Bear Stearns and Northern Rock had separate board risk committees which does not fill me with much confidence that they work as well as they should.

So what are the alternatives? I like the other ideas that surfaced in Nash’s article. Pitney Bowes reportedly has a list of 60 risk categories which are assigned to individuals who report about them to a board committee. Pitney Bowes thinks that when a particular risk or two is assigned to an individual, they are more likely to be accountable and take this oversight seriously. I agree that being able to focus on a few risks makes more sense in determining threat-levels than having to worry about 60+ risks all at once.  The article also raises an idea from a governance expert who suggests that a non-board risk committee comprised of select company executives and outside risk experts could work. I definitely see value in that idea as well because outside points of view are often critical in shaking up organizations who are rightfully concentrating on the next quarter and next customer demand. It is not easy.  

Risk radar is increasingly imperative today. Have no doubt about it.

In May I am speaking about reputation at a conference hosted by ID Analytics.  I am looking forward to it because the more I learn about identity theft and loss, the more I see the enormous threat to personal and corporate reputation. Two things this week crossed my desk (or should I say desktop) that highlighted the strong correlation between identity theft and risk to reputation:

• A new product is being rolled out by insurance broker Lockton and Lloyd – Data Breach Reputation Guard. “When a data breach is followed by adverse media attention, the Data Breach Reputation Guard element of the policy will reimburse a business for reputational harm.”
• The second identity loss-related piece of information was something I read on Marketing Pilgrim noting a CNet article on new research among information security professionals. The survey by Frost & Sullivan (I could not find on their web site, so sorry) found that a whopping three-quarters of IT security execs report that avoiding reputation damage to their organization is a top priority.

Our research at Weber Shandwick found that security breaches were among the top five reasons why companies lose reputation today. The number of stolen identities is only increasing.  The connection between identity theft and reputation could not be more apparent. Am glad to know that my comments will resonate with those in the audience. Certainly fits the times.

Reputation erodes in many ways. One sure-fire way is when employees spill the beans. A working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that employees lead the list of corporate whistleblowers when it comes to fraud.  Companies often wonder how they get themselves into these jams. It is actually pretty simple. Perhaps if they kept the lines of communications wide open or just a little open, employees would not have to resort to tattle-telling. Remember Sharon Watkins and Enron’s Kenneth Lay. If he had only listened and acted sooner.  We continually see reputations dashed as negative things come to light. The worse is when it surfaces little by little.  I wait every day to hear the Societe Generale story continue to unfold. Now we hear that another person may have been involved with rogue trader Jerome Kerviel. This week we heard that there were early warning signals alerting Societe Generale officers about the fuzzy transactions. Employee fraud is usually suspected by other employees but no one says anything out of fear. The article in BusinessWeek (January 28, 2008) where I learned about the corporate whistleblowers reports that 82% of them are ostracized, fired or demoted. Not much incentive for telling the truth.  

Source: National Bureau of Economic Research

My new book is out officially today (as I hinted last night).  It is titled Corporate Reputation: 12 Steps to Safeguarding and Recovering Reputation.

There is more information on a dedicated site — www.corporatereputation12steps.com. It is based on our discovery that the corporate reputation “stumble rate” continues to rise.  Over three-quarters (79 percent) of the world’s number-one most admired companies lost their crowns over the past five years in their respective industries. While reputation loss may now be inevitable, my new book offers a realistic roadmap to reputation recovery that can help any leader stabilize and regenerate a company’s most competitive asset.

It is pretty simple: recent corporate crises have demonstrated that a company’s reputation can be destroyed in seconds. A mishandled response, inappropriate act, product tampering, or poorly timed financial disclosure all have the power to instantly tarnish a respected reputation. As I see it, the well-managed and reputation-conscious company need not stand defenseless when faced with a damaged reputation.

We regularly get curious about things that happen in the communications and reputation space. Recently we were wondering if the frequency of “the company declined to comment” in the global media had risen or fallen in light of the intense media scrutiny that accompanies corporate crises and companies’ growing recognition of the need to be transparent.  My hypothesis, which was proven wrong, was that there had been a preciptious decline in “no comment” over the past several years. I based that assumption on the fact that “no comment” is increasingly perceived to be “guilty as read.” Instead no commentitis has risen steadily and although it has seen a few dips, remains standard operating procedure in the business world. Of course, every situation is different but reputations can be chipped over those two simple words.

Am off and running to Switzerland tomorrow for business meetings. Therefore I wanted to get you some reputation news before I pack my bags.

 I just was handed a wonderful report from AON on risk management. The survey is among 320 respondent organizations that have revenues of nearly $1 billion or more across many sectors and all regions of the globe. The findings are astounding as to what it says about reputation. Global business executives were asked about the top 10 risks they see today. Here they are in rank order:

Reputation damage reigns at the top. As the AON report says, “Damage to reputation is an enterprise -wide event that can lead to negative publicity, a decline in market share and the inability to recruit and retain top talent.” And that’s only half of it. Companies with eroding reputation lose customers, investors, easy access to new markets, ability to charge a premium, goodwill from the community, benefit of the doubt in time of crisis, and the list goes on.

Even more remarkable, reputation damage is the greatest threat no matter what region of the world. The Global Risk Management Survey also found that few companies are prepared for reputation damage.

AON, thanks for this report. I can use these findings in many places for my talks and writings. It is nice to have what I believe so strongly be confirmed.